Each year, outstanding achievement, teamwork, and companies are recognised across New Zealand and 2024 will be no different.

The RICS Awards bestow both local and global recognition. They recognise industry leading achievements and demonstrate the upholding of the highest standards of professionalism and ethics by individuals and teams across the built and natural environments.

The awards create a unique platform to showcase innovations and achievements across New Zealand’s built and natural environments, as well as encourage development and advancements within the industry. This year’s awards aim to attract wider participation from the sector, whereby promoting the highest professional standards, pioneering better places to live and work, and creating a force for positive social impact. We look forward to receiving visionary and inspiring nominations this year.

Experts from the judging committee will score each application and the winners will be announced at the New Zealand awards ceremony in August 2024.

Submissions for 2024 have now closed. Stay tuned for the Finalists announcement or register your interest in attending the Grand Ceremony via the contact details listed below.

Sponsorship opportunities

There are several promotional and sponsorship opportunities available. For more information on how you can get involved with the Awards, download the brochure or contact:

Michelle Manley
Partner Development & Public AffairsManager, New Zealand
mmanley@rics.org

Awards Ceremony

The New Zealand Awards winners will be announced at a formal cocktail ceremony held at Hilton Hotel, Quay St, Auckland on Thursday 22 August 2024.

2024 Judging Panel

Chair of the Judging Panel

Systems Creation Lead – Asset Management and Maintenance at Kāinga Ora - Homes and Communities

Rob is the Manager of National Asset Management seconded to the role of System Creation Lead, Asset Management and Maintenance at Kāinga Ora - Homes and Communities, where he is leading a team who are reshaping and transforming asset management practices and the way maintenance is delivered to c72,000 state owned properties in New Zealand. In the little spare time he has, he is also a senior officer in the Royal New Zealand Naval Reserve where he is the Commanding Officer of HMNZS PEGASUS in Christchurch and is Deputy Chair of the New Zealand Registered Architects Board.  Prior to taking up his role at Kāinga Ora, Rob was the CEO of Development Christchurch Limited (DCL), where he led a team focussed on supporting development opportunities and facilitating investment into Christchurch with the goal of contributing towards making Christchurch a modern world class city. Prior to this, Rob has held a number of leadership roles in New Zealand and abroad responsible for infrastructure development and management. Rob is a Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and has also been a Fellow of the Charted Institution of Water and Environmental Management. He has held a number of governance roles over the last 13 years, including the Arts Centre of Christchurch, Canterbury SPCA, St Andrews College and Dogwatch Sanctuary Trust. 

 

Headshot photo of Rob Hall, chair of the judging panel for RICS New Zealand Awards 2024

Rob Hall FRICS

Assurance Manager, Landcorp Farming Limited

Victoria has significant experience in environmental planning, policy development, compliance and sustainability, having been involved in resource management and strategic planning for over 30 years.

Her extensive experience of effective planning regulation and engagement across multi-disciplinary teams saw Victoria appointed as a key member of the local government planning recovery working group following the Canterbury earthquakes.  This small team were appointed to work with the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority to develop strategic plans, planning regulation and redevelopment opportunities required to achieve urgent redevelopment while ensuring sustainable urban development and communities. 

Victoria has extensive experience with both rural and urban planning to achieve effective and efficient sustainable land and water use.  These skills are now being used to identify synergies, gaps and opportunities in her current role as an assurance manager.

 

Headshot photo of Victoria Caseley FRICS, one of the RICS New Zealand 2024 Judges.

Victoria Caseley FRICS

Senior Associate, TSA Riley

David is a member of the RICS Australasia Advisory Board and has been a qualified Planning and Development Chartered Surveyor for nearly 20 years. He has worked in both New Zealand and the UK over his career, as a client and consultant.  His particular focus is the commercial viability of development, trying to stimulate urban regeneration or economic growth of places.  In addition, David is a qualified project manager with the Australian Institute of Project Management. David's educational qualifications include a Masters of Urban Regeneration and an MBA.

 

Headshot photo of David Jones MRICS, one of the RICS New Zealand 2024 Judges.

David Jones MRICS

Professor, The University of Auckland Business School

Dr Deborah Levy is a Professor of Property at the University of Auckland Business School. She is internationally recognized for her behavioural research focusing on property markets and is widely published in academic property journals. She is passionate about creating opportunities to bring academia and the profession together in order to produce outcomes beneficial to professionals, academics, and students. Dr Levy is a fellow of RICS and was awarded a Lifetime Achievement Award in 2017.

 

Headshot photo of Dr Deboray Levy FRICS, one of the RICS New Zealand 2024 Judges.

Dr Deboray Levy FRICS

Manager Specialist Asset Assessments, Auckland Council (Project Specialisation Office)

Ben is a dedicated surveyor who has a ‘passion for property’, having moved from the U.K. and has been living in New Zealand for 12 years.  He has worked across a number of  ‘codes’ during his career from Estate Management, Auction, Building Surveying and Valuation.

 

Headshot photo of Ben Meadows MRICS, one of the RICS New Zealand 2024 Judges.

Ben Meadows MRICS

Director, Axiom Building Consultants

Geoff is a director of Axiom Building Consultants delivering professional consultancy advice on commercial property, with specialisms in lease reinstatement, maintenance planning, defect diagnosis, and condition reporting.
Throughout his career Geoff has worked to find solutions that balance the technical aspects of building construction and regulation with the commercial goals of building owners and occupiers. He has been a chartered building surveyor for over 17 years, originally working for multi-disciplinary real estate firms in the United Kingdon, before re-locating to Christchurch in 2015.
Geoff is new a new addition to the RICS Awards New Zealand judging panel. In the past Geoff has been a supervisor, counsellor, and assessor for the RICS APC, and is passionate about supporting people into the profession. Outside of work Geoff enjoys the outdoors and is an active volunteer with the Civil Defence Response Teams, as well as being an Emergency Medical Technician with St John.

 

Headshot photo of Geoff Matthews MRICS, one of the RICS New Zealand 2024 Judges.

Geoff Matthews MRICS

Dean of Faculty of Architecture and Design Innovation at Victoria University of Wellington

Robyn worked in architectural practice, designing residential, commercial and industrial projects, ranging from Police stations, and office design to hospitals, prior to becoming an academic.  She has extensive expertise in zero carbon buildings, energy efficiency and productivity.  She is a Fellow of RICS, Director of the New Zealand Green Building Council (Research), Chair of the MoE’s  Ventilation Technical Advisory Group, Trustee of the Property Foundation and a member of the International Society for Indoor Air Quality and Climate. She is a Co-Director of the Healthy Housing Research Group which won the Prime Minister’s Science Team Prize in 2014 and the Rutherford Science Team Prize in 2021.

 

Headshot photo of Robyn Phipps FRICS, one of the RICS New Zealand 2024 Judges.

Robyn Phipps FRICS

Founder & Director, Urban Outcomes Limited

Natasha Possenniskie is a leading construction industry professional with more than 25 years’ experience in New Zealand and abroad.  Spanning both public and private sectors, Natasha’s career has developed in varied leadership roles as a client, consultant, main contractor and subcontractor.  As the sole Director of Urban Outcomes Limited, a boutique construction consultancy she established in 2015, Natasha specialises in providing Independent Certifier and Engineer to the Contract services on critical infrastructure projects. Natasha also acts as an Expert Witness on building disputes and she also routinely advises clients on project recovery, risk management, contract administration and procurement strategy.
Natasha is a Member of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (MRICS), the Society of Construction Contract Practitioners (SCCP), the New Zealand Institute of Building (MNZIOB) and is a Project Management Professional (PMP). She also sits on the Boards of Quotable Value Limited, Te Toi Mahana and the New Zealand Institute of Building.
Natasha was the recipient of the RICS Woman of the Built Environment Award in 2023.

 

Headshot photo of Natasha Possenniskie MRICS, one of the RICS New Zealand Awards 2024 Judges

Natasha Possenniskie MRICS

Director at ASJ Property Consultancy

Andrew leads the commercial building surveying team at ASJ Property Consultancy. His clients benefit from pragmatic advice when looking to acquire commercial property. He brings a particular focus on the management of risk around business interruption for both tenants and landlords.

 

Headshot photo of Andrew Sweeney MRICS, one of the RICS New Zealand 2024 Judges.

Andrew Sweeney MRICS

Head of Property and Commercial | Financial Services, TSB Bank Ltd

Bringing over 30 years of international property experience, Mark heads the Property and Procurement functions at TSB Bank with a focus on optimisation, sustainability, and compliance.

With a passion for the built environment and experience across the UK, Middle East and Australasia, Mark has an extensive background in property consultancy, acquisition and divestment of property, asset management, leasing, and tenant representation. Mark is an APC Chairperson and passionate advocate for RICS standards and professionalism.

 

Headshot photo of Mark Grant MRICS, one of the judges for RICS New Zealand Awards 2024

Mark Grant MRICS

“It remains an exciting time across the built and natural environments, despite the market being in what is hopefully a short period of uncertainty for many as the country looks to readjust priorities in the current economic climate. I look forward to recognising the positive impact and value that the profession is making across these realms for society, in this year’s Awards.”

Rob Hall FRICS

Chair of the Judging Panel

Before you begin preparing your submission materials, please be sure to read:

  • What award categories are available in 2024
  • What the judging criteria will be for each award
  • What the entry rules and procedures are for each award
Nominations open  29 January 2024
Nominations close 03 May 2024
Judging period May/June 2024
Finalists announced 15 July 2024
Winners announced  August 2024

Award Categories

Category

Criteria/weighting

Building Consultancy Team of the Year

Focusing on excellence in the building consultancy sector. This award recognises companies, teams or consortia who have demonstrated excellence in the provision of advice or services in post occupancy building inspection, technical due diligence, make good and related services.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20%
Sustainability 20%

Geomatics and Land Surveying Team of the Year

This award recognises excellence in the geomatics and land surveying including GIS and BIM applications. The rapidly evolving technology in this sector is merging computer science, GIS and more traditional surveying and mapping.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20%
Sustainability 20%

Project Management Team of the Year

Acknowledging companies, service providers, client side teams or contractors who were engaged in project management of a construction project during 2023. The successful applicant will demonstrate excellence in such areas as quality control, time management, budget control, procurement or construction management to deliver the outcome sought by the client.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20%
Sustainability 20%

Property / Facilities Management Team of the Year

Awarded to a company, team or consortia responsible for outstanding operational, financial, tenant or facilities management of real estate.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20%
Sustainability 20%

Quantity Surveying Team of the Year

Celebrating excellence in quantity surveying, this award recognises companies, teams or consortia engaged in outstanding quantity surveying work in 2023. This includes but is not limited to cost planning and control or contract and commercial management.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20%
Sustainability 20%

Real Estate Advisory Team of the Year

This award recognises excellence in the provision of real estate consultancy advice (not covered in other categories). It includes tenant advisory services, strategic portfolio advice, land and property development advice and related feasibility and business case work.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20%
Sustainability 20%

Real Estate Agency Team of the Year

This award acknowledges companies, teams and/or consortia demonstrating excellence in providing agency services related to the acquisition, sale, or leasing of properties in the office, retail, industrial or residential sectors.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20%
Sustainability 20%

Research Team of the Year

Acknowledging teams, consultancies, academic institutions and agencies responsible for engaging in research projects associated with the built environment.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20%
Sustainability 20%

Valuation Team of the Year

The Valuation Team of the Year recognises a company, team or consortia providing excellence in valuation services which uphold international standards and give confidence to end-users for their objectivity, independence and reliability on both commercial and/or residential projects.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20%
Sustainability 20%

Category Criteria/weighting

Emerging Achiever of the Year

The future of our profession rests on the shoulders of emerging professionals. The Emerging Achiever Award acknowledges one outstanding individual who has achieved excellence in their field. The individual selected will embody the highest standards of professionalism, be a role-model for their peers and be capable of making an outstanding contribution to the profession over the course of their future career.

Nominations in the individual awards category are assessed alongside two overarching criteria:

Recognised outstanding performance and achievement in the workplace; and

Recognised contribution to the profession and the wider community with a weighting against five categories, which are:

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration
20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20%
Sustainability 20%

Woman of the Built Environment Award

The Woman of the Built Environment Award recognises the outstanding contributions and achievements of senior women to our industry. The award celebrates inspirational role models to inspire the next generation of diverse professionals. Women from all disciplines of the industry are encouraged to enter.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20%
Sustainability 20%

Lifetime Achievement Award

Recognising commitment to RICS and the wider profession, the Lifetime Achievement Award is the most prestigious award for built environment professionals. The presentation of this award is subject to the determination of the judging panel that the recipient is worthy of this significant honour.

RICS will provide recommendation(s) on the worthy recipient for the judging panel’s consideration.

Category Criteria/weighting

Innovation Award

Future proofing the profession is a key challenge in a time of rapid changes. The Innovation Award recognises teams, companies and consortia engaged in developing innovative solutions, to sustain the profession for the future.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 10%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 40%
Sustainability 10%

Sustainability Project of the Year

This award demonstrates how innovation, design or construction techniques have been utilised by a team or client to address environmental challenges and improve the sustainability of the project outcome.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 10%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
10%
Sustainability 40%

Assessment criteria



Professionalism

Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability, and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes.

Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics.

Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable).

Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes.

Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an

advantage.

 
 
 
 

Teamwork / Collaboration

Effective coordination of skillsets among members of the team and with stakeholders. A demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion within the firm/team and their work. How does the firm/team embrace diversity and contribute to a more inclusive profession?

Detailing of challenges overcome in any process relative to complexity e.g. what were the difficulties or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Contribution of the surveyor to social outcomes.

RICS Standards adopted.

 
 
 
 
 

Outcome and achievement

Realisation of revenue against a predefined target.

Client satisfaction (demonstrated through third party endorsements as appropriate). What projects has the team successfully delivered in the previous calendar year?

Team demonstrates best practices in appropriate profession (building surveying, valuation, facilities management etc)

What steps have been taken to ensure the building’s future resilience?

 
 
 
 
 

Thought Innovation

Was an innovative approach used to deliver an outcome? What was this approach (technology, planning, procurement, construction) and why was this used over more conventional solutions?

How is the firm/team delivering an innovative approach which embraces new technologies?

Innovation in financing and viability.

Are innovative strategies embedded on projects or tasks that deliver a social impact? Level of creativity in overcoming challenges.

How has the firm/team demonstrated resilience and adaptability?

Sustainability

Does the team demonstrate the adoption of sustainability principles? e.g. climate change mitigation and adaptation, waste reduction, biodiversity conservation, social value creation.

Have the sustainability achievements of the team been quantified in numerical terms?

Environmental impact:

Does the team make efforts to measure and reduce the carbon emissions of its projects?

Does the team make efforts to quantify and improve the biodiversity impact of its projects?

Social Impact:

Does the team engage meaningfully with the communities impacted by its projects?

Does the team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability?

Health and Well-being:

How has the team actively contributed to people’s health and well-being?

Woman of the Built Environment Award



Professionalism

Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes.

Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics.

Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable).

Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes.

Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an

advantage.

Teamwork / Collaboration

Effective coordination of skillsets among team members and with stakeholders. Demonstration of change management process and minimising disruption.

Resources optimisation. How were resources effectively pulled and utilised to overcome the identified challenges and difficulties against a predefined target? Demonstration of commitment to diversity and inclusion of team or project

team will be highly regarded.

Outcome and achievement

Measurable success of nominated initiative(s)/project(s)/team(s) against a predefined target.

Challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity. What were the or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Cost effectiveness. How was cost managed effectively against a target? Client satisfaction and positive social impact.

Timely completion. Demonstration of how the project is managed effectively with respect to time?

Submission of letter of commendation will be highly regarded.

Thought Innovation

Was an innovative approach used to deliver the outcome?

Was any innovative outcome generated?

How was technology applied to deliver the outcome?

Any innovative technology applied to enhance site safety (if applicable)? Any smart information technology applied for document control and

communication to enhance productivity?

Sustainability

Quantitative analysis on sustainability considerations and achievements. Demonstration of creating better places and spaces for future generations. Demonstrated adoption of sustainable development principles.

Social Impact. How did the nominated team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability in the community and improve the community more

broadly?

 

Lifetime Achievement Award



Assessed on individual merit

RICS will provide recommendation(s) on the worthy recipient for the judging panel’s consideration.

Have they contributed significantly to the profession? How? Have they contributed significantly to RICS? How?

What have they done for the future of the profession?

How have they displayed exemplary professionalism throughout their career?

 

Emerging Achiever of the Year



Professionalism

Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes

Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics.

Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable).

Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes.

Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an

advantage.

Teamwork / Collaboration

Effective coordination of skillsets and with stakeholders.

A demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion and their work. How does the individual embrace diversity and contribute to a more inclusive profession?

Detailing of challenges overcome in any process relative to complexity e.g. what were the difficulties or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Contribution of the surveyor to social outcomes.

RICS Standards adopted.

 
 
 
 
 

Outcome and achievement

 
 
 
 

Measurable success of nominated initiative(s)/project(s)/team(s) against a predefined target.

Challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity. What were the or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Cost effectiveness. How was cost managed effectively against a target? Client satisfaction and positive social impact.

Timely completion. Demonstration of how the project is managed effectively with respect to time.

Submission of letter(s) of commendation will be highly regarded.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Thought Innovation

 
 
 
 
 

Was an innovative approach used to deliver the outcome? Was any innovative outcome generated?

How was technology applied to deliver the outcome?

Any innovative technology applied to enhance site safety (if applicable)? Any smart information technology applied for document control and

communication to enhance productivity?

 
 
 
 
 

Sustainability

 
 
 
 

Quantitative analysis on sustainability considerations and achievements.

Demonstration of creating better places and spaces for future generations. Demonstrated adoption of sustainable development principles.

Social Impact. How did the nominated team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability in the community and improve the community more broadly?

Register an account here

Each submission must be accompanied by specific submission materials, which will be reviewed by the judges.

Nomination will be accepted only upon acknowledgement of nomination materials.

Your submission should include:

  • Region and Category you are submitting for.
  • Nominator and Nominee contact details.
  • Main body of nomination – this should clearly explain the project, demonstrate a connection to the judging criteria and show a commitment to professionalism and ethics (showcasing at least 1 but no more than 3 projects that the team/individual has worked on). This is where you want to make it clear to the judges exactly why your submission is deserving of the award. Please note that this will not be a PDF upload, you will need to complete free text sections within the online form, including an introduction and responses to each applicable element of the judging criteria (professionalism, outcome and achievement, teamwork, innovation and sustainability). Word limits have been applied to each free text box in accordance with the criteria weighting. We recommend drafting your responses within a word document and then copying and pasting them into the online submission form.
  • Up to 3 testimonials (1 page each, PDF upload). For Individual Award categories, at least 1 testimonial must be supplied.
  • At least one photograph of the nominated team/individual and up to 5 additional photographs of the nominated team/individual and/or project(s) referenced in the submission.
  • Up to 3 pieces of other appropriate supporting material, such as technical documentation, media clippings, floor plans, videos, etc. (Maximum of 4 pages per piece of supporting material).
  • Your company logo.
  • A 100-word summary of the nomination for marketing purposes – what the project was and how the team/individual has showcased excellence (free text section within the form).
  • For the Emerging Achiever of the Year category, the Nominee’s full CV with references must be supplied to verify eligibility.

Your submission should clearly explain the project, team or individual and demonstrate a connection to the judging criteria, highlighting a commitment to professionalism and ethics. This is where you want to make it clear to the judges exactly why your submission is deserving of the award.

Please note that this will not be a PDF upload, you will need to complete free text sections within the online form, including an introduction and responses to each applicable element of the judging criteria (professionalism, outcome and achievement, teamwork, innovation, and sustainability).

Word limits have been applied to each free text box in accordance with the criteria weighting. We recommend drafting your responses within a word document and then copying and pasting them into the online submission form.

Team and company awards

1. Nominated project(s) and major/key team member(s) must be located or operated in the Awards region being submitted for.

2. Nominations can be made by the nominee (team, company or consortia) or a third party.

3. The project(s) which is the subject of the nomination must have been worked on within the 2023 calendar year, though not necessarily completed.

4. Nominations must be based on at least one but no more than three projects within the calendar year (nominating party to select).

5. A company may submit a joint nomination however, where a joint nomination is submitted a subsequent, stand-alone application from the same company, on the same project(s) and in the same category is not allowed.

6. Nominations must be submitted via the online submission platform. Where multiple nominations are being submitted by the one organisation, a separate online submission will need to be completed for each nomination.

7. Nomination must be accompanied by a 100-word summary for marketing purposes. 

8. Other relevant supporting materials/documents are optional but welcomed. These should be limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of supporting material/documents and three testimonials. (Documents and testimonials should be in PDF format.)

9. A logo must be provided as well as a photo of the team or individual nominated. This will be used for marketing purposes and during award presentations.

10. Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission.

11. The jury panel’s decision on eligibility of the nominations shall be final and is non appealable.

12. Any category which receives less than 2 nominations will not be awarded a winner, exceptions made at the Judge’s discretion.

Individual awards

1. Nominated individual must be currently located/operating/have worked in the Awards region being submitted for.

2. The project(s) which is the subject of the nomination must have been worked on within the 2023 calendar year, though not necessarily completed. However, submissions for the Woman of the Built Environment Award and Emerging Achiever Award can reference achievements throughout the nominee’s entire career. 

3. Nominations must be based on at least one but no more than three project(s) (nominating party to select).

4. Nominations must be submitted via the online submission form. Where multiple nominations are being submitted by the one organisation, a separate online submission form will need to be completed for each nomination.

5. Nomination must be accompanied by a 100-word summary for marketing purposes.

6. Nomination must be accompanied by at least 1 testimonial from a client, colleague or peer. (Testimonials should be in PDF format.)

7. Other relevant supporting materials/documents are optional but welcomed. These should be limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of supporting material/documents and two additional testimonials. (Documents and testimonials should be in PDF format.)

8. A logo must be provided as well as a photo of the individual nominated. This will be used for marketing purposes and during award presentations.

9. Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission.

10. The jury panel’s decision on eligibility of the nominations shall be final and is non appealable. 

11. Any category which receives less than 2 nominations will not be able to award a winner, exceptions made at the Judge’s discretion.

Emerging Achiever of the Year Award

1. In addition to the individual award criteria, the Emerging Achiever of the Year must have less than 10 years professional experience working in the built and/or natural environments to be eligible.

2. Nomination must be accompanied by the Nominee’s full CV with references, to verify eligibility.

  • An online submission is completed for each nomination.
  • For team awards, at least one but no more than three projects have been included in the nomination.
  • For team awards, the nomination is accompanied by at least 1 photograph of the team/individuals nominated (for marketing use), a 100-word summary of the nomination (for marketing use) and includes a copy of the nominee’s company logo (as appropriate).
  • For individual awards, the nomination is accompanied by at least 1 photograph of the individual nominated (for marketing use), a 100-word summary of the nomination (for marketing use), at least 1 testimonial and a copy of the nominee’s company logo (as appropriate).
  • For the Emerging Achiever of the Year category only, the nomination is accompanied by the Nominee’s full CV with references, to verify eligibility.
  • Supporting material may include testimonials, photographs, technical documentation, media clippings, floor plans, etc. to support the adjudication process.
  • Supporting material is limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of relevant material/documents and three testimonials.
  • Confidential information is clearly labelled ‘RICS Awards in Confidence’.

Privacy 

Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission. 

We will use the information you provide to contact you in relation to the Awards. You can ask us to stop contacting you at any time by emailing us at awards@rics.org Further details of how we use, hold and store your information, and your legal rights, can be found in our Privacy Policy. 

Terms and Conditions 

Judges will exclude any submissions that are not completed in full. 

The closing date for entries is 03/05/2024 however RICS reserves the right to extend the deadline. 

The judges’ decision is final, and awards will be made at their discretion. 

Judges reserve the right to move a project into another category if they feel it would better fit the criteria. 

We regret that feedback cannot be provided on individual entries. 

RICS reserves the right to use photographs and content of entries for PR and publicity purpose. By entering your images and information as part of your submission for the RICS Awards you agree to grant RICS or any third-party we deem suitable worldwide, non-exclusive, unlimited right to use, publish and print in any media. 

Entrants will be deemed to have accepted these rules and procedures along with the terms and conditions and to have agreed to be bound by them when entering this competition. 

By entering you are agreeing to be contacted by RICS with details of the RICS Awards. 

It is the responsibility of the entrant to establish that there are no restrictions or reasons the project cannot be entered and that all interested parties have been contacted and are aware of the entry. 

To help us manage and maintain the reputation of the RICS Awards you must inform us about any negative media stories relating to the entry that have occurred during the 12 months preceding the awards ceremony. Negative publicity does not necessarily mean that your entry will be disallowed; however, if it is not disclosed your entry may be disqualified. 

Entrants warrant RICS that it has the full and exclusive right to present their credentials (e.g. “Surveyor”) as such. RICS accepts these credentials in good faith and cannot verify that they are correct. Accordingly, any dispute regarding entrants’ credentials must be dealt with between the parties concerned and not with RICS.