The RICS Awards showcase the most inspirational initiatives and developments in land, real estate, construction and infrastructure. They recognise outstanding achievement, teamwork and companies.

Each year, outstanding achievement, teamwork, and companies are recognised across Australia and 2024 will be no different.

The RICS Awards bestow both local and global recognition. They recognise industry leading achievements and demonstrate the upholding of the highest standards of professionalism and ethics by individuals and teams across the built and natural environments.

The awards create a unique platform to showcase innovations and achievements across Australia’s built and natural environments, as well as encourage development and advancements within the industry. This year’s awards aim to attract wider participation from the sector, promoting the highest professional standards, pioneering better places to live and work, and creating a force for positive social impact. We look forward to receiving visionary and inspiring nominations this year.

Experts from the judging committee will score each application and the winners will be announced at the Australia awards ceremony in September 2024.

Submissions for 2024 have now closed. Stay tuned for the Finalists announcement or register your interest in attending the Grand Ceremony via the contact details listed below.

Sponsorship opportunities

There are several promotional and sponsorship opportunities available. For more information on how you can get involved with the Awards, download the brochure or contact:

Nick Hudson
Partnership Development Manager – Australia
nhudson@rics.org

 

Awards Ceremony

The Australia Awards winners will be announced at a formal dinner ceremony to be held at RACV City Club in Melbourne on Thursday 19 September 2024.

Judging Panel

Acting Commissioner, Land & Environment Court of NSW

Dr David Parker is an internationally recognised property industry expert and highly regarded property academic with forty years’ experience in property including being Valuer General of NSW, Professor of Property at the University of South Australia and an Acting Commissioner of the NSW Land and Environment Court. Dr Parker is a Visiting Professor of Property at the Henley Business School, University of Reading and has published several books and numerous academic papers, being a regular expert witness on property funds management and property valuation matters in the Federal Court and the Supreme Court. Further information concerning Dr Parker may be found at: davidparker.com.au.

Director, In-Touch Advisory

Stephen is both an RICS Chartered Quantity Surveyor and Chartered FM Surveyor, and holds AIQS and IFMA certified designations with extensive design, delivery and operational phase experience.

Stephen is a member of the RICS Australasian Advisory Board. He is also currently serving as the Regional Director – Australasia & Southeast Asia for IFMA's Facility Management Consultant Council (FMCC).

Since 2012, he has been a member of Standards Australia’s MB-022 committee, and an Australian delegate to ISO/TC 267 developing the ISO 41000 series of FM standards.

Additionally, he has served on multiple industry boards over an extended period including leadership positions with the Australian Government’s FM Action Agenda, FMA Australia, Property Council, IFMA, and the ISO.

In-Touch Advisory connects stakeholders with life cycle solutions for the Built Environment.

Managing Director, Wholesale Securities Pty Ltd

Tim is a seasoned professional with 30+ years' experience in property funds management, operations, investment, and development across Australia. As principal of Wholesale Securities, a renowned commercial real estate fund manager, Tim brings extensive expertise. He previously held a senior executive position at the Sarich Family Office, playing a pivotal role in establishing them as a leading private property investor. Tim also served as Director at Macquarie Bank, overseeing projects valued at over $800 million. With exceptional leadership and strategic acumen, he successfully established property funds management businesses at Goldmate Property Group and PrivateInvest. Tim holds a Bachelor's degree in Business/Commerce, prestigious professional affiliations, and licenses. He continues to contribute significantly to Australia's property landscape.

Senior Lecturer – Property, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne

Dermot has been a Property academic for the last 14 years predominantly at University of Melbourne, Faculty of Architectures, Building and Planning. Dermot led the undergraduate Property Major for 8 years from 2012 to 2020. He has taught across development, feasibility, planning, market research, risk, investment and  finance and project management.

Dermot had a 30-year career across property consulting, property development, and banking and finance, quantity surveying, commercial management, contract claims and litigation support, and project management to director and general management roles. Clients including large healthcare entities, constructor’s association, international hotel group, property entities, builders and sub-contractors.

Director - Civil, ANZ VSA, Victoria, AECOM

A Chartered Surveyor since 1994, Brigitte has significant experience in business planning, operations management, strategic planning and advisory, project management, contract management, design management and facilities management. As a senior leader in AECOM Brigitte currently leads a team of over 100 airfield, civil and geotechnical engineers in Victoria working on some of the region’s largest infrastructure projects with a strong focus in the energy, transport, aviation and government sectors. She also sits on Steering Committees for multi-billion dollar Transport programs in Victoria. Prior to this Brigitte led the AECOM Project and Program Management team of 85 staff across the southern region.

National Leasing Manager, Stockland Pty Ltd

In her role as National Leasing Manager for Stockland. Tracy is currently leading Stockland’s flagship workplace development leasing strategy at MPark, Affinity Place and Piccadilly. Through her international experience, Tracy has developed a broad range of property skills over her 25 years in the industry.

From mixed-use development valuation in the Middle East and Africa, to Investment Management in the United Kingdom, to delivering commercial outcomes on behalf of owners and occupiers across New Zealand and, more recently, formulating and executing occupier office leasing strategy throughout Australia.

Tracy is also supporting the next generation of RICS professionals via her role chairing assessment panels.

National Commercial Manager, DT Infrastructure Pty Ltd

Liam is a commercial manager and quantity surveyor with 20 years’ experience across infrastructure and building sectors. After navigating family life and a move across three countries, he joined RICS as a Chartered Quantity Surveyor in 2018. His passion lies in conflict avoidance and dispute resolution, where he utilises his expertise to mitigate risk and tackle challenging situations. Liam leverages his knowledge to guide others and promote the adoption of a traditional quantity surveying skillset within the Australian construction industry. His commitment to excellence and driving positive change has earned him respect in the field.

Liam Murray image

Development Manager, The GPT Group

Having originally qualified as a Chartered Building Surveyor in London, I now specialise in Industrial Property Development.

With 15+ years’ experience in Melbourne and 6 years in London, I have successfully delivered a variety of commercial, industrial, education and retail projects from inception through to completion, and provided strategic technical due diligence advice on commercial acquisitions, development agreements and agreements for lease.   

When I am not working, I am usually enjoying time with family and friends.  

Peter Phillips headshot

National Operations Manager, Pre-Construction, Mirvac

Michael is a chartered Quantity Surveyor who has practiced nationally and internationally for 29 years and has experience in the design and delivery of residential build to sell, residential build to rent, office, mixed use, retail and industrial projects of varying complexity and size.

Michael leads the Mirvac Pre-Construction team comprising of over 50 Project Managers, Project Design Managers and Cost Planners.  This team is responsible for all Mirvac’s pre-construction activity (excluding housing) from project inception and into delivery.  During his almost 20 years at Mirvac Michael has been involved in a vast array of iconic Build to Sell Apartments, Build to Rent Apartments, Office, Mixed Use, Retail and Industrial projects in NSW, VIC, QLD and WA.

Michael is passionate about the built form and how teams come together to deliver projects that inspire, are safe, sustainable and that the team are all always proud to walk past after delivery.  He a Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (FRICS) and a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors (FAIQS).

Mark commenced his career in valuations holding positions with Chesterton International and Richard Ellis (now CBRE) before working in the City of London during the late 1990s.

Returning from the UK, Mark next undertook primarily residential development projects of varying scale and complexity, mainly in Melbourne’s inner and south-eastern suburbs.

An opportunity then arose to join McDonald’s Australia where his role was site acquisition and securing of town planning consent across three states. A similar role with Coles Group Property Developments Limited followed.

Currently a consultant providing property advice to a broad client base, Mark is a Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. 

Mark Upton image

Before you begin preparing your submission materials, please be sure to read:

  • What award categories are available in 2024
  • What the judging criteria will be for each award
  • What the entry rules and procedures are for each award
Nominations open 29 January 2024
Nominations close 03 May 2024
Judging period May/June 2024
Finalists announced 22 July 2024
Winners announced  Sep 2024

Award Categories

Category

Criteria/weighting

Building Certification Team of the Year

Recognising companies, teams or consortia responsible for consultancy advice or assessment in certification of building projects in Australia. This award highlights the crucial role of building certification to ensure the health and wellbeing of building occupants’ post-construction.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20%
Sustainability 20%

Building Consultancy Team of the Year

Focusing on excellence in the building consultancy sector. This award recognises companies, teams or consortia who have demonstrated excellence in the provision of advice or services in post occupancy building inspection, technical due diligence, make good and related services.

Professionalism 20%  
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20% 
Sustainability 20% 

Project Management Team of the Year

Acknowledging companies, service providers, client-side teams or contractors who were engaged in project management of a construction project during 2023. The successful applicant will demonstrate excellence in such areas as quality control, time management, budget control, procurement or construction management to deliver the outcome sought by the client.

Professionalism 20%  
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
 20% 
Sustainability 20%

Property / Facilities Management Team of the Year

Awarded to a company, team or consortia responsible for outstanding operational, financial, tenant or facilities management of real estate. 

Professionalism 20%  
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20% 
Sustainability 20%

Quantity Surveying Team of the Year

Celebrating excellence in quantity surveying, this award recognises companies, teams or consortia engaged in outstanding quantity surveying work in 2023. This includes but is not limited to cost planning and control or contract and commercial management. 

Professionalism 20%  
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20% 
Sustainability 20%

Real Estate Advisory Team of the Year

This award recognises excellence in the provision of real estate consultancy advice (not covered in other categories). It includes tenant advisory services, strategic portfolio advice, land and property development advice and related feasibility and business case work.

Professionalism 20%  
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20% 
Sustainability 20%

Real Estate Agency Team of the Year

This award acknowledges companies, teams and/or consortia demonstrating excellence in providing agency services related to the acquisition, sale, or leasing of properties in the office, retail, industrial or residential sectors. 

Professionalism 20%  
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
20% 
Sustainability 20%

Research Team of the Year

Acknowledging teams, consultancies, academic institutions and agencies responsible for engaging in research projects associated with the built environment.

Professionalism 20%  
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20% 
Sustainability 20%

Valuation Team of the Year

The Valuation Team of the Year recognises a company, team or consortia providing excellence in valuation services which uphold international standards and give confidence to end-users for their objectivity, independence and reliability on both commercial and/or residential projects.

Professionalism 20%  
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20%
Sustainability 20%

Category Criteria/weighting

Emerging Achiever of the Year

The future of our profession rests on the shoulders of emerging professionals. The Emerging Achiever Award acknowledges one outstanding individual who has achieved excellence in their field. The individual selected will embody the highest standards of professionalism, be a role-model for their peers and be capable of making an outstanding contribution to the profession over the course of their future career.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20%
Sustainability 20%

Woman of the Built Environment Award

The Woman of the Built Environment Award recognises the outstanding contributions and achievements of senior women to our industry. The award celebrates inspirational role models to inspire the next generation of diverse professionals. Women from all disciplines of the industry are encouraged to enter.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 20%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation 20%
Sustainability 20%

Lifetime Achievement Award

Recognising commitment to RICS and the wider profession, the Lifetime Achievement Award is the most prestigious award for built environment professionals. The presentation of this award is subject to the determination of the judging panel that the recipient is worthy of this significant honour.

RICS will provide recommendation(s) on the worthy recipient for the judging panel’s consideration.

Category Criteria/weighting

Environmental Impact Award

This category recognises teams involved in projects where innovation, design or construction techniques have been utilised to address environmental challenges and improve sustainability.

Professionalism 20%
Teamwork / Collaboration 10%
Outcome and achievement 20%
Thought Innovation
 10%
Sustainability 40%

Assessment criteria

Professionalism

Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability, and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes.

Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics.

Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable).

Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes.

Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an advantage.

Teamwork / Collaboration

Effective coordination of skillsets among members of the team and with stakeholders. A demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion within the firm/team and their work. How does the firm/team embrace diversity and contribute to a more inclusive profession?

Detailing of challenges overcome in any process relative to complexity e.g. what were the difficulties or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Contribution of the surveyor to social outcomes.

RICS Standards adopted.

Outcome and achievement

Realisation of revenue against a predefined target.

Client satisfaction (demonstrated through third party endorsements as appropriate). What projects has the team successfully delivered in the previous calendar year?

Team demonstrates best practices in appropriate profession (building surveying, valuation, facilities management etc)

What steps have been taken to ensure the building’s future resilience?

Thought Innovation

Was an innovative approach used to deliver an outcome? What was this approach (technology, planning, procurement, construction) and why was this used over more conventional solutions?

How is the firm/team delivering an innovative approach which embraces new technologies?

Innovation in financing and viability. Are innovative strategies embedded on projects or tasks that deliver a social impact? Level of creativity in overcoming challenges.

How has the firm/team demonstrated resilience and adaptability?

Sustainability

Does the team demonstrate the adoption of sustainability principles? e.g. climate change mitigation and adaptation, waste reduction, biodiversity conservation, social value creation.

Have the sustainability achievements of the team been quantified in numerical terms?

Environmental impact:

Does the team make efforts to measure and reduce the carbon emissions of its projects?

Does the team make efforts to quantify and improve the biodiversity impact of its projects?

Social Impact:

Does the team engage meaningfully with the communities impacted by its projects? Does the team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability?

Health and Well-being:

How has the team actively contributed to people’s health and well-being?

Woman of the Built Environment Award

 

Professionalism

Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes.

Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics.

Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable).

Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes.

Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be anmadvantage.

Teamwork / Collaboration

Effective coordination of skillsets among team members and with stakeholders. Demonstration of change management process and minimising disruption.

Resources optimisation. How were resources effectively pulled and utilised to overcome the identified challenges and difficulties against a predefined target? Demonstration of commitment to diversity and inclusion of team or project

team will be highly regarded.

Outcome and achievement

Measurable success of nominated initiative(s)/project(s)/team(s) against a predefined target.

Challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity. What were the or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Cost effectiveness. How was cost managed effectively against a target? Client satisfaction and positive social impact.

Timely completion. Demonstration of how the project is managed effectively with respect to time?

Submission of letter of commendation will be highly regarded.

Thought Innovation

Was an innovative approach used to deliver the outcome?

Was any innovative outcome generated? 

How was technology applied to deliver the outcome?

Any innovative technology applied to enhance site safety (if applicable)? Any smart information technology applied for document control and communication to enhance productivity?

Sustainability

Quantitative analysis on sustainability considerations and achievements. Demonstration of creating better places and spaces for future generations. Demonstrated adoption of sustainable development principles.

Social Impact. How did the nominated team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability in the community and improve the community more broadly?

 

Lifetime Achievement Award

 

Assessed on individual merit

RICS will provide recommendation(s) on the worthy recipient for the judging panel’s consideration.

Have they contributed significantly to the profession? How? Have they contributed significantly to RICS? How?

What have they done for the future of the profession?

How have they displayed exemplary professionalism throughout their career?

 

Emerging Achiever of the Year

 

Professionalism

Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes

Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics.

Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable).

Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes.

Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an advantage.

Teamwork / Collaboration

Effective coordination of skillsets and with stakeholders.

A demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion and their work. How does the individual embrace diversity and contribute to a more inclusive profession?

Detailing of challenges overcome in any process relative to complexity e.g. what were the difficulties or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Contribution of the surveyor to social outcomes.

RICS Standards adopted.

Outcome and achievement

Measurable success of nominated initiative(s)/project(s)/team(s) against a predefined target.

Challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity. What were the or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Cost effectiveness. How was cost managed effectively against a target? Client satisfaction and positive social impact.

Timely completion. Demonstration of how the project is managed effectively with respect to time.

Submission of letter(s) of commendation will be highly regarded.

Thought Innovation

Was an innovative approach used to deliver the outcome?

Was any innovative outcome generated? 

How was technology applied to deliver the outcome?

Any innovative technology applied to enhance site safety (if applicable)? Any smart information technology applied for document control and communication to enhance productivity?

Sustainability

Quantitative analysis on sustainability considerations and achievements.

Demonstration of creating better places and spaces for future generations. Demonstrated adoption of sustainable development principles.

Social Impact. How did the nominated team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability in the community and improve the community more broadly?

 

Environmental Impact Award

Professionalism

Recognised third party endorsements of the project as professionally outstanding.

Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical competence, finance, legal, environment, and sustainability to achieve outcomes.

Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics.

Adoption of international standards will be an advantage but is not essential.

Teamwork / Collaboration

Effective coordination of skillsets among members of the team and with stakeholders.

A demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion in the delivery of the project(s).

Detailing of challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity e.g. What were the difficulties or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome?

Contribution of the surveyor to social outcomes. RICS Standards deployed on the project.

Outcome and achievement

Realisation of nominated project against a predefined target.

Cost effectiveness: how was cost managed against a predefined target? Client satisfaction (demonstrated through third party endorsements as appropriate).

Project demonstrates best practices in appropriate profession (property, building surveying, facilities management, etc).

Thought Innovation

Are innovative approaches used to deliver outcomes? Is technology embraced within the team?

Innovation in financing and viability.

New approaches in the planning, procurement, construction, delivery or outcome measurements on projects.

Are innovative strategies embedded on projects that deliver a social impact? Level of creativity in overcoming challenges.

Sustainability

How does the project demonstrate the highest commitment to sustainability? Has the environmental impact of the project been evaluated though an established methodology? (e.g. lifecycle assessment) Was any relevant certification achieved?

How does the project address the following categories of environmental sustainability?

Climate change mitigation (i.e. carbon reductions)

Were the carbon emissions (embodied and/or operational) of the project (or the associated asset) measured and reduced?

How does the carbon footprint of the project compare to conventional practices?

Climate change adaptation

How does the project increase asset resilience to climate change (e.g. extreme weather events)?

How does the project increase resilience to climate change?

Resource efficiency and circular economy

Were efforts made to reduce resource use in comparison to conventional practices? e.g. material recovery/reuse

Were efforts made to ensure future activities (e.g. building demolition) can contribute to a circular economy?

(e.g. design for deconstruction)

Air, water and soil pollution

Did the project minimise (or reverse) the emission of pollutants to air, water and soil?

Biodiversity

Did the project create the right conditions to increase the biodiversity of the local area?

Water use

Were efforts made to quantify and reduce (fresh)water use?

Land use

Did the project deliver a change in land use that resulted in a positive environmental impact?

Register an account here

Each submission must be accompanied by specific submission materials, which will be reviewed by the judges.

Nomination will be accepted only upon acknowledgement of nomination materials.

Your submission should include:

  • Region and Category you are submitting for.
  • Nominator and Nominee contact details.
  • Main body of nomination – this should clearly explain the project, demonstrate a connection to the judging criteria and show a commitment to professionalism and ethics (showcasing at least 1 but no more than 3 projects that the team/individual has worked on). This is where you want to make it clear to the judges exactly why your submission is deserving of the award. Please note that this will not be a PDF upload, you will need to complete free text sections within the online form, including an introduction and responses to each applicable element of the judging criteria (professionalism, outcome and achievement, teamwork, innovation and sustainability). Word limits have been applied to each free text box in accordance with the criteria weighting. We recommend drafting your responses within a word document and then copying and pasting them into the online submission form.
  • Up to 3 testimonials (1 page each, PDF upload). For Individual Award categories, at least 1 testimonial must be supplied.
  • At least one photograph of the nominated team/individual and up to 5 additional photographs of the nominated team/individual and/or project(s) referenced in the submission.
  • Up to 3 pieces of other appropriate supporting material, such as technical documentation, media clippings, floor plans, videos, etc. (Maximum of 4 pages per piece of supporting material).
  • Your company logo.
  • A 100-word summary of the nomination for marketing purposes – what the project was and how the team/individual has showcased excellence (free text section within the form).
  • For the Emerging Achiever of the Year category, the Nominee’s full CV with references must be supplied to verify eligibility.

Your submission should clearly explain the project, team or individual and demonstrate a connection to the judging criteria, highlighting a commitment to professionalism and ethics. This is where you want to make it clear to the judges exactly why your submission is deserving of the award.

Please note that this will not be a PDF upload, you will need to complete free text sections within the online form, including an introduction and responses to each applicable element of the judging criteria (professionalism, outcome and achievement, teamwork, innovation, and sustainability).

Word limits have been applied to each free text box in accordance with the criteria weighting. We recommend drafting your responses within a word document and then copying and pasting them into the online submission form.

Team and company awards

1. Nominated project(s) and major/key team member(s) must be located or operated in the Awards region being submitted for.

2. Nominations can be made by the nominee (team, company or consortia) or a third party.

3. The project(s) which is the subject of the nomination must have been worked on within the 2023 calendar year, though not necessarily completed.

4. Nominations must be based on at least one but no more than three projects within the calendar year (nominating party to select).

5. A company may submit a joint nomination however, where a joint nomination is submitted a subsequent, stand-alone application from the same company, on the same project(s) and in the same category is not allowed.

6. Nominations must be submitted via the online submission platform. Where multiple nominations are being submitted by the one organisation, a separate online submission will need to be completed for each nomination.

7. Nomination must be accompanied by a 100-word summary for marketing purposes. 

8. Other relevant supporting materials/documents are optional but welcomed. These should be limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of supporting material/documents and three testimonials. (Documents and testimonials should be in PDF format.)

9. A logo must be provided as well as a photo of the team or individual nominated. This will be used for marketing purposes and during award presentations.

10. Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission.

11. The jury panel’s decision on eligibility of the nominations shall be final and is non appealable.

12. Any category which receives less than 2 nominations will not be awarded a winner, exceptions made at the Judge’s discretion.

Individual awards

1. Nominated individual must be currently located/operating/have worked in the Awards region being submitted for.

2. The project(s) which is the subject of the nomination must have been worked on within the 2023 calendar year, though not necessarily completed. However, submissions for the Woman of the Built Environment Award and Emerging Achiever Award can reference achievements throughout the nominee’s entire career. 

3. Nominations must be based on at least one but no more than three project(s) (nominating party to select).

4. Nominations must be submitted via the online submission form. Where multiple nominations are being submitted by the one organisation, a separate online submission form will need to be completed for each nomination.

5. Nomination must be accompanied by a 100-word summary for marketing purposes.

6. Nomination must be accompanied by at least 1 testimonial from a client, colleague or peer. (Testimonials should be in PDF format.)

7. Other relevant supporting materials/documents are optional but welcomed. These should be limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of supporting material/documents and two additional testimonials. (Documents and testimonials should be in PDF format.)

8. A logo must be provided as well as a photo of the individual nominated. This will be used for marketing purposes and during award presentations.

9. Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission.

10. The jury panel’s decision on eligibility of the nominations shall be final and is non appealable. 

11. Any category which receives less than 2 nominations will not be able to award a winner, exceptions made at the Judge’s discretion.

Emerging Achiever of the Year Award

1. In addition to the individual award criteria, the Emerging Achiever of the Year must have less than 10 years professional experience working in the built and/or natural environments to be eligible.

2. Nomination must be accompanied by the Nominee’s full CV with references, to verify eligibility.

  • An online submission is completed for each nomination.
  • For team awards, at least one but no more than three projects have been included in the nomination.
  • For team awards, the nomination is accompanied by at least 1 photograph of the team/individuals nominated (for marketing use), a 100-word summary of the nomination (for marketing use) and includes a copy of the nominee’s company logo (as appropriate).
  • For individual awards, the nomination is accompanied by at least 1 photograph of the individual nominated (for marketing use), a 100-word summary of the nomination (for marketing use), at least 1 testimonial and a copy of the nominee’s company logo (as appropriate).
  • For the Emerging Achiever of the Year category only, the nomination is accompanied by the Nominee’s full CV with references, to verify eligibility.
  • Supporting material may include testimonials, photographs, technical documentation, media clippings, floor plans, etc. to support the adjudication process.
  • Supporting material is limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of relevant material/documents and three testimonials.
  • Confidential information is clearly labelled ‘RICS Awards in Confidence’.

Privacy 

Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission. 

We will use the information you provide to contact you in relation to the Awards. You can ask us to stop contacting you at any time by emailing us at awards@rics.org Further details of how we use, hold and store your information, and your legal rights, can be found in our Privacy Policy. 

Terms and Conditions 

Judges will exclude any submissions that are not completed in full. 

The closing date for entries is 03/05/2024 however RICS reserves the right to extend the deadline. 

The judges’ decision is final, and awards will be made at their discretion. 

Judges reserve the right to move a project into another category if they feel it would better fit the criteria. 

We regret that feedback cannot be provided on individual entries. 

RICS reserves the right to use photographs and content of entries for PR and publicity purpose. By entering your images and information as part of your submission for the RICS Awards you agree to grant RICS or any third-party we deem suitable worldwide, non-exclusive, unlimited right to use, publish and print in any media. 

Entrants will be deemed to have accepted these rules and procedures along with the terms and conditions and to have agreed to be bound by them when entering this competition. 

By entering you are agreeing to be contacted by RICS with details of the RICS Awards. 

It is the responsibility of the entrant to establish that there are no restrictions or reasons the project cannot be entered and that all interested parties have been contacted and are aware of the entry. 

To help us manage and maintain the reputation of the RICS Awards you must inform us about any negative media stories relating to the entry that have occurred during the 12 months preceding the awards ceremony. Negative publicity does not necessarily mean that your entry will be disallowed; however, if it is not disclosed your entry may be disqualified. 

Entrants warrant RICS that it has the full and exclusive right to present their credentials (e.g. “Surveyor”) as such. RICS accepts these credentials in good faith and cannot verify that they are correct. Accordingly, any dispute regarding entrants’ credentials must be dealt with between the parties concerned and not with RICS.

Why participate?

For you: 

  • Garner widespread industry acknowledgment and elevate your personal profile.
  • Become a role model for the profession.
  • Enhance your career prospects.
  • Influence the future of the profession through content creation and conference engagement. 

For your firm: 

  • Boost team morale and recognise exceptional staff.
  • Showcase your brand's distinction among competitors.
  • Attract remarkable talent and investment. 

 For your colleague: 

  • As well as individuals entering, nominations are welcome from employers, clients, or peers for those championing the role of a surveyor.  Employers could incorporate these awards as part of their recognition schemes, by highlighting employees within the firm, as well as externally, those who are going above and beyond within their roles. Those nominating do not need to be members of RICS themselves but must know the individual and their achievements well.