Greg Clark, Urbanist
Borane Gille, Head of Cities Innovation, The Business of Cities
For almost 8,500 years, we have embraced population growth, new technologies and the spread of trade and civilisation. We did this first by building, and then, regenerating, cities. A turning point in the global urbanisation process came in 1980 due to the emergence of three connected urbanisation trends.
In developed countries, a re-urbanisation process began following several decades of deindustrialisation where many cities had lost populations and declined. The shift to knowledge, services and innovation economies and the growing mobility of talent fuelled the re-urbanisation process in the global North, with urban renewal and regeneration the means to support this process. Cities began to exert a fresh gravitational pull and could offer a new quality of life, supported by global connections, their cosmopolitan character, and a rich artistic life and vibrancy.
At around the same time, the ‘Asian Tiger’ economies (Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea) had demonstrated a new development model. This model was based on export-oriented industrialisation, business-friendly reforms, as well as investment in human capital and infrastructure. The shift to manufacturing in the Asian Tigers subsequently led to better services, innovation and experience as these countries sought to ‘climb the value chain’ by building the cities and infrastructures that could support higher value activity. Inspired by the successes of these states, many developing nations started to pursue the twin paths of industrialisation with urbanisation. These countries rapidly shifted their economies towards manufacturing, attracting international corporates and connecting to globalising value chains. The resulting job opportunities encouraged widespread rural to urban migration in pursuit of work and higher incomes.
In the 1990s, faster urbanisation trends were also occurring in poorer countries. Without the drive of industrialisation, urbanisation in these states was subject to push factors: wars & conflicts, insecurity, resource scarcity, droughts, crop failures, and more. As a result, the migration of people to cities also accelerated.
Since 1980, this ‘co-urbanisation’ wave has accelerated, unleashing a 100-year cycle. By 2080, it is estimated that the percentage of humans in cities and towns will have doubled from roughly 40% to 80%, the number of people living in cities will have quadrupled from 2.3 billion to around 9.2 billion – and the range of cities of over 1 million people will have multiplied by six from 275 to about 1,600. In the next column, we will touch on some of the uncertainties about this data and how those projections are changing.
Humankind has been making cities for almost 9,000 years, but urban acceleration in the present century is without precedent. By 2100, projections suggest that almost 10 billion people will live in at least 10,000 larger cities. We are on a great human anthropological trek. We are an urbanising species, building a planet of cities. We don’t know how to do it, so we have to invent it.
There are three larger sources of tools that come from beyond government policy.
Exponential technologies: AI, digital twins, augmented reality, facial recognition, drones, cameras, sensors and big data, as well as convergence and climate technologies, will help shape our new energy, water, waste, food and construction systems. These new technologies allow us to do more with less, to optimise the city and to reduce the unwanted side effects of urban growth.
Intentional capital: This includes the new modes of money from sustainable finance to climate finance, impact investing and green bonds. The effect of these is to use the costs and logic of capital as a deliberate tool to foster social and climate transition.
Place leadership: Increasingly, we see citizens, universities, hospitals, faith groups, sports clubs and the private sector (especially infrastructure, utilities and real estate providers) being willing to create new shared platforms to combine the leadership of a place with local and metropolitan governments. This might include a business district in transition, a cultural quarter, an innovation hub or a health precinct. But it could also be civic leadership for a whole city or town, a metropolitan area or a wider region.
Figure 1: Urban population change in global regions
Source: UN World Urbanisation Prospects, World Bank. Data for 2080 based on extrapolation from rate of change 1980–2050.
*Data for 2080 for Oceania, Greater China and Middle East based on rate of change 2020–2050 due to more strongly changing urbanisation dynamics from 1980–2020.
These ten imperatives shape our planet. They will determine whether we can make our urbanisation path inclusive and broadly accepted, or divisive and conflictual. The outcome is uncertain.
In the next article in The planet of cities series, we will review whether, with falling birth rates and other factors, we will reach peak numerical human population and peak percentage urbanisation sooner than estimated.